- Noah James45′
- Dylan Sing48′
- Dylan Sing62′
- Carson Hodgson72′
- Carson Hodgson92′
—
Western Michigan · form coming in
- L@
Evansville0–2Conf
- D@
UIC0–0Conf
- D@
Wright State0–0Conf
- D@
Villanova2–2Conf
- Wvs
Bowling Green1–0Conf
Oakland · form coming in
- L@
Purdue Fort Wayne0–1Conf
- Wvs
Milwaukee2–0Conf
- L@
Michigan State0–2Conf
- L@
IUPUI0–2Conf
- Wvs
Michigan2–1Conf
Pre-match strength context
Western Michigan
Shortlistr Strength
93
Oakland
Shortlistr Strength
26
Verdict
Western Michigan were the favourites by 67 strength points.
Western Michigan · Lineup
Ranked by minutes- MD
Carson Hodgson98′×2
- DF
Jaylen Shannon98′
- MD
Landon Fisher98′
- DF
Nick Stone90′
- GK
Ethan Brandt89′
- FW
Tom Cooklin81′
- DF
Jonathan Robinson79′
- FW
Dylan Sing76′×2
- DF
Will Perkins75′
- MD
Noah James74′
- MD
Tanner Hodgson66′
- FW
Roni Sylejmani53′
- DF
Vianney Durand30′
- DF
Braxton Arpachinda27′
- MD
Connor Burkett15′
- MD
Stephen Belanger9′
- GK
Sean O'Meara9′
- DF
Dante Bailey7′
Oakland · Lineup
Ranked by minutes- GK
Michael Sly Jr98′
- MD
Gabriel Baylon84′
- DF
Carson Ballagh83′
- MD
Ville Ahola83′
- FW
Mikey Ketteman83′
- DF
Malik Sylvester83′
- MD
Marco Mazzei80′
- DF
Micah Paul Sonnenberg80′
- DF
Noah Roka70′
- DF
Jace Foster65′
- FW
Donavan Philip55′
- FW
Luke Benford43′
- MD
Mohamed Hammoud28′
- DF
Sebastian Nuzzo18′
- DF
Diego Perez18′
- MD
Nour Aoude18′
- DF
Louis Helm15′
- DF
Noah Bickford15′
- MD
Dylan Wismont15′
- FW
Christian Rossi15′
- MD
Jaffer Ali15′
- MD
Taiga Shiokawa14′
Top performers
- 1Carson HodgsonImpact2.39MD·98′·2G·6 shots
- 2Dylan SingImpact1.44FW·76′·2G·4 shots
- 3Noah JamesImpact0.82MD·74′·1G·4 shots
Top performers
- 1Noah RokaImpact0.34DF·70′
- 2Gabriel BaylonImpact0.32MD·84′
- 3Micah Paul SonnenbergImpact0.30DF·80′
Shot timeline
Cumulative shots · goal markers · 27 shots total
Western Michigan26 shotsOakland1 shotsGoalShot
Shot maps
Where each team's shots came from — locations, distances, xG per shot
Detailed match stats
Expected goals, possession territories, defensive intensity & shot quality